Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:42 pm
Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:04 pm
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:14 am
Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:08 am
Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:56 pm
Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:04 am
Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:22 am
Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:53 am
Fri May 26, 2017 7:31 pm
ANZAC wrote:North fork... just saying.
Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:31 pm
Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:48 pm
Wed Jun 07, 2017 8:40 pm
jdijulio wrote:So, wait a minute, does anyone have it on good authority that shooting off of I-90 is not going to get you into trouble - Assuming it's far enough away from the freeway?
I guess I'm wondering if anyone has something more than "Well, there are a bunch of shell casings, so I guess it's fine" and instead maybe some thing more like "I've personally spoken with <insert government agency here> and they confirmed that the following GPS coordinates are in fact open for recreational target shooting, provided you mind the normal rules, etc".
Wed Jun 07, 2017 9:16 pm
junkname wrote:jdijulio wrote:So, wait a minute, does anyone have it on good authority that shooting off of I-90 is not going to get you into trouble - Assuming it's far enough away from the freeway?
I guess I'm wondering if anyone has something more than "Well, there are a bunch of shell casings, so I guess it's fine" and instead maybe some thing more like "I've personally spoken with <insert government agency here> and they confirmed that the following GPS coordinates are in fact open for recreational target shooting, provided you mind the normal rules, etc".
Target shooting is permitted on USFS land nationwide unless otherwise posted in a specific area. I don't know if it is codified US law or administrative USFS policy, but it has been the case for at least the last 30 years, and I suspect as long as USFS has existed. This is easily verifiable on USFS recreation pages. There are a few objective restrictions, such as it is not permissible to shoot on or across a road or trail, into or across a body of water, across or within a 150 yards of any developed site such as a trail head or camp site, and no shooting of natural resources such as trees or rocks. There are a few subjective rules like no shooting in an "unsafe manner" and no shooting which may endanger another person. For Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie, there is a page and video which explains this at https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/mbs/alerts-notices/?cid=stelprdb5324910. As noted and linked in posts above, there is an order currently in effect which explicitly prohibits shooting along most of 90 through Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie. The order contains a map.
The most current USFS Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie map was printed in 1999, so it is likely inaccurate as far as what land is public and private, especially around the perimeter of USFS land which is frequently sold/leased to loggers. There are maps as well for each ranger district, but I don't know how current they are. USFS has a page at https://www.fs.fed.us/ivm/index.html which I assume is the most current as far as property ownership is concerned and it's what I refer to when scouting places to shoot.
If you're on USFS land, outside the areas on the closure order, there are no signs posted prohibiting shooting, and you're abiding by the other general provisions for target shooting, you're good to go. Unfortunately, there are barely a handful of drive-up places between North Bend and Cle Elum that check all those boxes, and they attract a lot of meth heads and hillbillies.
Fri Jun 09, 2017 4:17 pm
jdijulio wrote:For being your very first post, I'm impressed at the effort you put into it - Thank you!
That said, I guess I'm still a little concerned with how best to interpret the map (Which I did look at before my making my original post) with respect to distances. Unfortunately, the resolution of the map is not all that great, which makes it nearly impossible to make out which roads are which, there is no scale to determine distance, etc.
If I were to hazard a guess, after looking at a Google Map, it appears that the coordinates noted above (47.364162,-121.53132) are approximately 2 - 3 miles (as the crow flies) from the highway. Overlaying that over the closure map, it seems reasonable to me that location would be outside the closure order area. But again, that's a guess (no matter how probable / educated it may be).
As I have no interest in being wrong, of course, I'm hoping someone has some first hand knowledge that, indeed, it's 100% legal to shoot @ 47.364162,-121.53132. Or if not, perhaps coordinates of another location that is fair game.
Thanks all for the info!
Fri Jun 09, 2017 11:25 pm
myusername wrote:jdijulio wrote:For being your very first post, I'm impressed at the effort you put into it - Thank you!
That said, I guess I'm still a little concerned with how best to interpret the map (Which I did look at before my making my original post) with respect to distances. Unfortunately, the resolution of the map is not all that great, which makes it nearly impossible to make out which roads are which, there is no scale to determine distance, etc.
If I were to hazard a guess, after looking at a Google Map, it appears that the coordinates noted above (47.364162,-121.53132) are approximately 2 - 3 miles (as the crow flies) from the highway. Overlaying that over the closure map, it seems reasonable to me that location would be outside the closure order area. But again, that's a guess (no matter how probable / educated it may be).
As I have no interest in being wrong, of course, I'm hoping someone has some first hand knowledge that, indeed, it's 100% legal to shoot @ 47.364162,-121.53132. Or if not, perhaps coordinates of another location that is fair game.
Thanks all for the info!
That's USFS land, well outside the closure order's area, and there were no signs posted prohibiting shooting the last time I was there (October 2016). It's a highly trafficked shooting location though. There are a couple other smaller, yet still decent, spots further down the road, but the road is permanently gated at that shooting location, so you would have to walk or bike for a ways.