|
Register •
FAQ •
My feedback
• Login
|
|
 |
 |
It is currently Sat Sep 23, 2023 8:35 am
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Issues - Ruger American Ranch x39 model 16976 (mini-30 mags)
Author |
Message |
Barfly
Site Supporter
Location: Lacey Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 Posts: 2185
Real Name: Jim
|
Man, I couldn't wait to get this rifle. I got it a little while back and finally got a chance to take it out about a week ago. I am so disappointed That it makes me sick...
I LOVE Rugers and thought this would be a fun little rifle. Well, it probably would be, except for the shit-show engineering behind making the Mini-30 mags work with it.
The mags don't positively lock in. There is NOTHING to support the front of the mag when it is "locked" into the magwell. It wobbles front-to-back when inserted, significantly changing the feed alignment for the rounds. If I don't apply forward pressure on the bottom of the mag, the nose of the bullets will not feed, the just smash into the bottom of the action. It's a bitch to cycle the bolt AND apply forward pressure to the mag AND hold the rifle.
I've been looking all over Google and there are lots of people bitching about the mini-30 mag springs, but I don't think this is the magazine's fault. This is a shitty magwell design. There just isn't any forward support to maintain proper feeding alignment. There isn't a stud or lug or anything for the cutout in the front of the mini-30 magazine to fit onto for support.
Had same result with both of the 20rd factory Ruger mags I tried.
I was so excited to go shoot it, but ultimately left the range disgusted with it.
I'm not sure now if I want to call Ruger to hear what their possible fix could be or pony up the money and try the Aftermarket AKM magazine well available online that accepts Magpul AKM Pmags...
Anybody else have similar issues?
|
Sun Sep 17, 2023 8:46 pm |
|
 |
MadPick
Site Admin
Location: Renton, WA Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 Posts: 51062
Real Name: Steve
|
Well, that's disappointing.
It seems that generally the Ruger American rifles are good performers for the price; I have a couple of them (.223 and 300BLK) and I have no complaints.
_________________SteveBenefactor Life Member, National Rifle AssociationLife Member, Second Amendment FoundationPatriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of AmericaLife Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsLegal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy CoalitionMember, NAGR/NFGRPlease support the organizations that support all of us.Leave it cleaner than you found it.
|
Sun Sep 17, 2023 8:54 pm |
|
 |
Barfly
Site Supporter
Location: Lacey Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 Posts: 2185
Real Name: Jim
|
MadPick wrote: Well, that's disappointing.
It seems that generally the Ruger American rifles are good performers for the price; I have a couple of them (.223 and 300BLK) and I have no complaints. You have the versions that take AR mags? I have been considering one, but now am not 100% sure, lol.
|
Sun Sep 17, 2023 9:08 pm |
|
 |
MadPick
Site Admin
Location: Renton, WA Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 Posts: 51062
Real Name: Steve
|
My .223 takes AR mags, yes. My 300BLK is older and uses the small Ruger mag.
_________________SteveBenefactor Life Member, National Rifle AssociationLife Member, Second Amendment FoundationPatriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of AmericaLife Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsLegal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy CoalitionMember, NAGR/NFGRPlease support the organizations that support all of us.Leave it cleaner than you found it.
|
Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:43 am |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Caveman Jim and 25 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|