Author |
Message |
sreyemj
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 Posts: 1367
|
Thinking about getting a PCC before July, both the Ruger PC9 and the PSA Ar-9 are cheap/look fun. Both take Glock mags, both break down in the middle. Anyone have any thoughts which would be preferable?
|
Fri May 24, 2019 11:56 am |
|
|
Guns4Liberty
Site Supporter
Location: Lynnwood/Bothell Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 Posts: 8562
Real Name: Curtis
|
Go with the Ruger - you won't be disappointed. Lots of nice features in a well-built package.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 12:06 pm |
|
|
Rafman
Site Supporter
Location: Woodinville Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 Posts: 341
Real Name: Rafael
|
I have both...The Ruger is a bit heavier compared to the PSA. Honestly can't go wrong with either. I've read how some AR9's can be a pain in regards to reliability but I've have yet to have any issues (only taken to the range twice).
The only issues I have had with my Ruger is the peep sight somehow fell off and got lost (Ruger replaced and I made sure to use loc-tite) and using the clock mag, I really have to push them pretty good in the mag well and almost slam the bottom of the magazine to make sure it is locked in.
its hard to pick one over the other, just depends what your plans are with it.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 1:18 pm |
|
|
sreyemj
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 Posts: 1367
|
Guns4Liberty wrote: Go with the Ruger - you won't be disappointed. Lots of nice features in a well-built package. Does the takedown mechanism lock up tight? I'm inclined to try the Ruger just because it's a bit different.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 2:12 pm |
|
|
Guns4Liberty
Site Supporter
Location: Lynnwood/Bothell Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 Posts: 8562
Real Name: Curtis
|
sreyemj wrote: Guns4Liberty wrote: Go with the Ruger - you won't be disappointed. Lots of nice features in a well-built package. Does the takedown mechanism lock up tight? I'm inclined to try the Ruger just because it's a bit different. Yes, it does. I was concerned about that, too, but after having shot my buddy's PC9 takedown, I have seen for myself that the lock-up is solid and it returns to zero. Well, at least his does...I can't speak for them all.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 2:53 pm |
|
|
OhShoot!
Site Supporter
Location: Bellingham Canada Joined: Thu Jan 3, 2013 Posts: 4999
Real Name: Josheewa
|
Take a look at the Extar 9mm too. A blast of a gun for only $439 shipped. You'll need a lot of 9mm ammo to keep up with it though. Mine pulls home defense duty without any qualms. Probably the best home defense pistol I've owned to date once it was outfitted with a Holosun optic. Super quiet suppressed too. https://extarusa.com/ep9.htm
_________________ It must be frustrating always being the smartest person in the room.-Jagerbomber35
Divided we fall.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 3:01 pm |
|
|
PinSniper
Site Supporter
Location: Seattle Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 Posts: 765
Real Name: Erik
|
With respect to 1639, the only real question is if you ever want a Ruger.
Since AR9s are ARs, the lower is commonly sold separately, which means it's not subject to 1639.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 6:08 pm |
|
|
sreyemj
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 Posts: 1367
|
PinSniper wrote: With respect to 1639, the only real question is if you ever want a Ruger.
Since AR9s are ARs, the lower is commonly sold separately, which means it's not subject to 1639. Good point.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 7:08 pm |
|
|
gunblaster
Location: Puyallup Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 Posts: 570
|
PinSniper wrote: Since AR9s are ARs, the lower is commonly sold separately, which means it's not subject to 1639. The lower receiver - which is the "firearm" - absolutely is subject to 1639. Uppers are not.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 10:04 pm |
|
|
MadPick
Site Admin
Location: Renton, WA Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 Posts: 52036
Real Name: Steve
|
gunblaster wrote: PinSniper wrote: Since AR9s are ARs, the lower is commonly sold separately, which means it's not subject to 1639. The lower receiver - which is the "firearm" - absolutely is subject to 1639. Uppers are not. No, it's not. The 1639 transfer requirements are for semi-auto rifles only, and a lower is not a rifle.
_________________SteveBenefactor Life Member, National Rifle AssociationLife Member, Second Amendment FoundationPatriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of AmericaLife Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsLegal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy CoalitionMember, NAGR/NFGRPlease support the organizations that support all of us.Leave it cleaner than you found it.
|
Fri May 24, 2019 10:06 pm |
|
|
quantsuff
Site Supporter
Location: central wa Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 Posts: 3554
|
I am disappoint, canonical answer is "get one of each."
|
Sat May 25, 2019 5:51 am |
|
|
Pablo
Site Supporter
Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28178
Real Name: Ace Winky
|
quantsuff wrote: I am disappoint, canonical answer is "get one of each." Winning! How about this in the mix? https://www.classicfirearms.com/cbc-ind ... m-sba3-231
_________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?
Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
|
Sat May 25, 2019 6:04 am |
|
|
|