Already?



Just a prediction.............

Maybe a few hours early. Check back around sunset in the blue cities.

Hopefully they don't attack the US capital and search for members of Congress to eliminate.

No worries there. Joe sent out a warning

In music form...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mzf5ABpDV_g

A little confused at the arguments.
Supreme Court says there is no Constitutional protection for abortions because it is not in the Constitution or history of the country.
Yet the Dems say social media is protected by the first amendment (social media not in Constitution) and AR15s are not legal because they are not in the Constitution.
So if it is something they want it doesn't matter if it is in the Constitution or not.

It only makes sense if you're retarded, 'er liberal.

And now we have Barry calling out (I assume to BLM/antifa) to go out and protest.... Think they will remain 'peaceful'?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/0 ... oe-v-wade/

This case wasn't about the morality of abortion; it was about who has the power to legislate on abortion. The court rightly found that, according to the Constitution, this was an issue for the States to decide on their own per the 10th Amendment. It is not within the purview of the federal government. Of course, this nuance is lost on those in favor of unrestricted abortions, but if you're going to try to reason with them as to the legitimacy of this SCOTUS decision, my advice would be to stay focused on the constitutionality of the case, not the morality of it (although I think that is certainly a discussion that needs to be had as well).

I am going with this. Well written.

My adding 0.02$, I think abortion is a pretty thin reed to use as one would define as a true FREEDOM. Or a RIGHT, CIVIL RIGHT, HUMAN RIGHT.

The problem with the abortion argument is that its the classic conflict of church and state --- when you start trying to have arguments with someone's 'beliefs' as a basis rather than facts or logic, there can be NO consensus or middle ground. Thats why there is a clause in the Constitution that declares a separation of church and state. Right or wrong comes down to your beliefs --- legality comes down to the beliefs of the people making the laws. The SCOTUS just told us the Constitution says that happens at the state level --- NOT the federal level.

why do all the articles seem to really point out "without exceptions in the case of rape or incest."

Like how much incest abortions are going on out there and why would that specifically need to be an exception? What about the I got black out drunk and fucked the whole frat house now i'm pregnant and need an abortion exception?

Babies haven't made choices yet, they're actually innocent and not in some subject woo woo patchuli infused essence of the universe way.

Regardless the decision was correct and the lib media even interviewed an expert who said abortion isn't in the constitution.

If you want an amendment for it then go to town and start the amendment process. I'm sure you know how it's done.

While I agree with you regarding arguing beliefs vs facts and logic, there is not anything in the Constitution that declares a separation of church and state. The establishment clause protects against government establishing or interfering with religion.
Probably nitpicking but it seems to be a common misconception.
There is also nothing in the Constitution protecting a "right" to abortion. Roe was bad law, period.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk