|
|
|
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:57 am
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
Gun control hearings packed
Author |
Message |
Dave Workman
Site Supporter
Location: Ahead of the pack Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 Posts: 3434
|
Washington State Gun Control Battle Warming Up With nearly 1,000 people on both sides of the gun rights issue listening, Second Amendment advocates, including some retired law enforcement professionals, told a Washington State Senate panel that proposed gun control measures in that state will do nothing to prevent crimes, but only penalize law-abiding citizens. http://libertyparkpress.com/washington- ... e-warming/
_________________ "The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer." - D.H. Lawrence
|
Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:10 pm |
|
|
Classic
Site Supporter
Location: Federal Way Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 Posts: 5492
|
But were the wacko liberal listening??? I doubt it because it doesn't fit the message they are sending to Americans
_________________ Banned for calling GOD a racist! Oh that's tight, Seattle guns is DEAD!
|
Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:19 pm |
|
|
Massivedesign
Site Admin
Location: Olympia, WA Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 Posts: 38307
Real Name: Dan
|
Keely did an amazing job repesenting the 2A!! Big shout out to her.
Honerable mentions to Alan, Joe and Phil too. Thank ALL of you for stepping up and bringing facts to the emotional debate.
To the guy from GOAL, thanks for basically throwing bump fires under the bus in your poorly prepared speech giving up concessions that would further jeopardize the fragile footing we have on the 2A in this state.
|
Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:33 pm |
|
|
Benja455
Site Supporter
Location: White Center Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 6489
|
Massivedesign wrote: Keely did an amazing job repesenting the 2A!! Big shout out to her.
Honerable mentions to Alan, Joe and Phil too. Thank ALL of you for stepping up and bringing facts to the emotional debate.
To the guy from GOAL, thanks for basically throwing bump fires under the bus in your poorly prepared speech giving up concessions that would further jeopardize the fragile footing we have on the 2A in this state. What did the guy from GOAL say? And to confirm - GOAL is who exactly?
|
Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:37 pm |
|
|
NWGunner
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu May 2, 2013 Posts: 12475
Real Name: Steve
|
http://wagoal.org/wordpress/Under 'About Us' it says they are "fairly pro gun". WTF is that?
|
Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:11 pm |
|
|
BlDtyLry
Site Supporter
Location: Snohomish, WA Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 Posts: 1369
Real Name: Bo
|
_________________ "I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life." ~ Four Leaf Tayback
|
Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:35 pm |
|
|
Benja455
Site Supporter
Location: White Center Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 6489
|
Huh. Looks like GOAL - and their website - is stuck in 1996.
|
Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:43 pm |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
Hey Dave, heard you on KVI this morning. You gave good answers on the bump stock issue and the other bills too.
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:01 am |
|
|
Guns4Liberty
Site Supporter
Location: Lynnwood/Bothell Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 Posts: 8562
Real Name: Curtis
|
I watched the entire hearing on the live stream. With very few exceptions, the testimony from the "pro" panelists was predictably filled with emotional appeals and devoid of facts or logic, whereas the testimony from the "con" side was very fact-based and focused on exposing the pitfalls of the proposed legislation. It was a perfect reflection of today's gun rights debate - one side hoping for people to feel their way to conclusions, and the other side hoping for people to think their way to conclusions. You know we have reached a sad, low point in the dialogue when the side using childish, ridiculous, incoherent "arguments" has a slight edge.
|
Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:10 am |
|
|
Dave Workman
Site Supporter
Location: Ahead of the pack Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 Posts: 3434
|
WA anti-gunners hint at initiative if gun control bills failEvergreen State gun prohibitionists hinted Monday that if they fail to move their gun control agenda through the legislature this year, they may consider another initiative. https://conservativefiringline.com/wa-a ... ills-fail/
_________________ "The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer." - D.H. Lawrence
|
Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:27 am |
|
|
leadcounsel
Site Supporter
Location: Can't say Joined: Sun Sep 7, 2014 Posts: 8134
|
Guns4Liberty wrote: I watched the entire hearing on the live stream. With very few exceptions, the testimony from the "pro" panelists was predictably filled with emotional appeals and devoid of facts or logic, whereas the testimony from the "con" side was very fact-based and focused on exposing the pitfalls of the proposed legislation. It was a perfect reflection of today's gun rights debate - one side hoping for people to feel their way to conclusions, and the other side hoping for people to think their way to conclusions. You know we have reached a sad, low point in the dialogue when the side using childish, ridiculous, incoherent "arguments" has a slight edge. I like to think of myself of an open minded thinker, and have emotional intelligence. There's a time when emotions are actually more important than logic. For instance, relationships. You don't "logic" your way through dating, friendships, etc. Having said that, emotional arguments for gun control simply fail. They are factually wrong. Gun control not only fails to REDUCE violence, but in overwhelming cases it INCREASES violence in the aggregate both short and long term. So their emotional appeals are actually counter productive and DANGEROUSLY wrong. That's the reason MORE gun control is always needed to achieve the "results" of less violence. It's a slippery slope because banning "A" never reduces the violence, so they ban "B" and when that fails, they ban "C." Just look at England, Australia, Canada... 1st world nations that incrementally and ultimately banned nearly every type of gun, and are now down to banning pellet guns, kitchen knives, and pointy sticks... More bans simply disarm citizens and leave them defenseless. Governments also only really work when there is a balance of power between the people and the government. Remove that balance and governments get very corrupted. In the worst examples in history, total gun bans have led to a lopsided powerful governments. A few examples of outright gun control in history show us horrific results. The figures are historical estimates since few records of how millions of people died were kept. They are staggering figures. These examples occurred less than a century ago, meaning there are still people alive that lived through this history: * 1920s - 1930s: Stalin - author of the "Great Famine," implemented a 5 year plan to eradicate undesireables and take total government control of private property. Private property such as land and farms was stolen by the state and private gun ownership was banned. The cost was about 7,000,000 civilian lives. Stalin's brutality was so bad toward his own citizens that some actually welcomed the German invasion and helped the Germans! *1930s - 1940s: Nazis murdered tens of millions and led to WWII through, in part, total control of citizens and bans on private firearm ownership. It's unclear (and largely unimportant) exactly what type and when guns were banned, perhaps before the Nazis, perhaps under Nazi rule as guns were incrementally banned. But the fact remained that the people were disarmed and easy to control. It's estimated up to 17,000,000 civilians were murdered by Nazis in various oppressive settings (ghettos, starved, slave labor, work camps, concentration camps, collateral effects of war, etc.). * 1950s-1970s: Mao took dictatorship rule over China and total control over production and banned firearms. Slavery, oppression, famine, work camps, assassinations, and genocide starved, brutalized, and murdered some estimated 45,000,000 humans. There are other examples in history with staggering numbers of deaths. But there is also the undocumented ruined lives, oppression, pain, suffering, etc. of every citizen under such a dictatorship. No freedom, no joy, daily fear that effected hundreds of millions of people. Tell anti-gunners to think about these numbers and ask them if they trust the government to have total control. I bet most liberals would say they do not trust the police, state, military, or federal government.
_________________ I defend the 2A. US Army Combat Veteran and Paratrooper: OIF Veteran. BSM and MSM recipient. NRA Lifetime. Entertainment purposes only. I'm a lawyer, but have not offered you legal advice.
|
Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:59 am |
|
|
Guns4Liberty
Site Supporter
Location: Lynnwood/Bothell Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 Posts: 8562
Real Name: Curtis
|
leadcounsel wrote: . . .emotional arguments for gun control legislation simply fail. FIFY It's not just gun control. I can't think of a single legislative issue wherein emotional arguments are more important than logic.
|
Tue Jan 16, 2018 10:25 am |
|
|
BlDtyLry
Site Supporter
Location: Snohomish, WA Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 Posts: 1369
Real Name: Bo
|
Emotional appeal is all they have.
_________________ "I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life." ~ Four Leaf Tayback
|
Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:13 pm |
|
|
beckdw
Site Supporter
Location: Tri -Cities Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 Posts: 2798
Real Name: David
|
The liberals are crying that our government is being controlled by a racist megalomaniac, who we can't trust to take care of us and protect us. But then, they want us to give up our "tactical" rifles to that very government. REALLY?! "The government is evil because they're taking away our social programs, our healthcare, our better wages, increasing our taxes, the cops are killing black people for no good reason, corporations are running our government and we have become slaves to them... But, let's give them our tactical weapons so that they can keep us safe by making sure that they are the only ones with those kinds of weapons..."
|
Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:25 pm |
|
|
leadcounsel
Site Supporter
Location: Can't say Joined: Sun Sep 7, 2014 Posts: 8134
|
beckdw wrote: The liberals are crying that our government is being controlled by a racist megalomaniac, who we can't trust to take care of us and protect us. But then, they want us to give up our "tactical" rifles to that very government. REALLY?! "The government is evil because they're taking away our social programs, our healthcare, our better wages, increasing our taxes, the cops are killing black people for no good reason, corporations are running our government and we have become slaves to them... But, let's give them our tactical weapons so that they can keep us safe by making sure that they are the only ones with those kinds of weapons..." Just another example of their complete illogic.
_________________ I defend the 2A. US Army Combat Veteran and Paratrooper: OIF Veteran. BSM and MSM recipient. NRA Lifetime. Entertainment purposes only. I'm a lawyer, but have not offered you legal advice.
|
Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:08 pm |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|