Author |
Message |
ironworker78
Site Supporter
Location: puyallup Joined: Sat Nov 3, 2012 Posts: 1146
|
ANZAC wrote: ironworker78 wrote: ANZAC wrote: spikedzombies wrote: Its like a regular transfer from state to state iirc. The buyer pays the transfer fee. So it should be a single fee and of course tax. I could see sellers offering to pay the fee if they have an FFL they prefer. Nearly the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Yes, no one ever offered "free shipping" on items as an inducement to someone to buy.... or included a tank of gas with a car they sold, or threw in an extra mag with a gun they sold. Once again nearly the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Good job.
_________________ If your Dad doesn't have a beard you've got two Moms
|
Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:01 pm |
|
|
spikedzombies
Site Supporter
Location: Lakewood, WA Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 Posts: 4056
Real Name: brad aka bubba
|
They cannot tax taxes on the fee itself.
Tax on transfer fees
Neither sales tax nor use tax apply on any fees charged by the Washington gun dealer for processing the required state and federal paperwork.
In addition, use tax does not apply to the service charge for contacting the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) when the charge is stated separately from the selling price of the firearm and freight and/or delivery charges, insurance, etc.
However on the transfer, which kit sure if it includes in State transfers now or not.
Tax on the interstate transfer of a firearm
A Washington gun dealer is required to collect use tax from a Washington buyer at the time the firearm is delivered to the buyer. Use tax is collected on the total purchase price, including freight/delivery and insurance charges.
If the purchase price is not evident, it is up to the gun dealer to determine the taxable amount by either requiring the purchaser to show the purchase price or by obtaining the selling price from the out-of-state seller.
_________________ ALL MY FIREARMS WILL ONLY BE TRANSFERRED THROUGH I-5 Guns And Ammo (Lacey WA)
|
Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:10 pm |
|
|
NWRed
Site Supporter
Location: Puyallup for now Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 Posts: 2100
|
ANZAC wrote: platz wrote: The DOR does not have a say in collecting info on sales from dealers. It is in the law that dealers no longer have to collect the tax and they only send handgun info to the DOL. Don't let facts get in the way of a good argument. Neither of you believe the DOR can audit a licensed business's books and sales tax collection rates to verify compliance?
|
Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:14 pm |
|
|
1811GNR
Site Supporter
Location: East Renton Plateau Joined: Tue Jul 5, 2011 Posts: 914
|
How many dealers will increase their transfer fee once this awful law is implemented? It really shouldn't hold up to a court challenge. Multiple subjects, requiring a fee be paid to a private business. Didn't someone check with DOR and find that use tax was still required to be paid? [Rant on]594 and it's supporters are anti-American, beat their same sex spouses and kick puppies![/Rant]
Sent from FBHO! using tinfoil and satellites
|
Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:21 pm |
|
|
ANZAC
Site Supporter
Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251
|
1811GNR wrote: How many dealers will increase their transfer fee once this awful law is implemented? It really shouldn't hold up to a court challenge. Multiple subjects, requiring a fee be paid to a private business. Didn't someone check with DOR and find that use tax was still required to be paid? [Rant on]594 and it's supporters are anti-American, beat their same sex spouses and kick puppies![/Rant]
Sent from FBHO! using tinfoil and satellites Use tax applied to private sales before 594, and 594 doesn't change anything. But the dealers will not be required to collect it (for now). viewtopic.php?f=114&t=45427
|
Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:35 pm |
|
|
1811GNR
Site Supporter
Location: East Renton Plateau Joined: Tue Jul 5, 2011 Posts: 914
|
ANZAC wrote: 1811GNR wrote: How many dealers will increase their transfer fee once this awful law is implemented? It really shouldn't hold up to a court challenge. Multiple subjects, requiring a fee be paid to a private business. Didn't someone check with DOR and find that use tax was still required to be paid? [Rant on]594 and it's supporters are anti-American, beat their same sex spouses and kick puppies![/Rant]
Sent from FBHO! using tinfoil and satellites Use tax applied to private sales before 594, and 594 doesn't change anything. But the dealers will not be required to collect it (for now). http://waguns.org/viewtopic.php?f=114&t=45427No shit! Just another bit of the deception in that POS that is 594. Edited to add: May your chains rest lightly upon you. Sent from FBHO! using tinfoil and satellites
|
Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:41 pm |
|
|
jim_dandy
Site Supporter
Location: Snohomish County & Pierce County Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 Posts: 659
|
ironworker78 wrote: ANZAC wrote: I could see sellers offering to pay the fee if they have an FFL they prefer.
Nearly the dumbest thing I have ever heard. PAPISJEEP wrote: there is about 3000 more comments right up there with it To be fair, only about 500 of those are probably dumb. The rest of the posts are when he has to double down and defending the original dumb posts despite seeing evidence and/or logic to the contrary.
|
Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:23 pm |
|
|
|