Author |
Message |
thefuryoffire
Site Supporter
Location: Fairwood, WA Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 Posts: 1111
Real Name: Jon
|
Starting 7/23: http://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillN ... &Year=2017The i-594 "improvements" bill has passed!
|
Thu May 18, 2017 3:47 pm |
|
|
sreyemj
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 Posts: 1367
|
I suppose I should be grateful... it's difficult.
|
Thu May 18, 2017 3:56 pm |
|
|
DGM33
Site Moderator
Location: Renton/Kent Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 Posts: 3548
Real Name: Jacy
|
I guess I should look into a C&R license.
|
Thu May 18, 2017 4:02 pm |
|
|
leadcounsel
Site Supporter
Location: Can't say Joined: Sun Sep 7, 2014 Posts: 8134
|
Well we can complain about 594, but that this is clarified and beneficial is fantastic.
I let mine lapse, but may re-get one....
_________________ I defend the 2A. US Army Combat Veteran and Paratrooper: OIF Veteran. BSM and MSM recipient. NRA Lifetime. Entertainment purposes only. I'm a lawyer, but have not offered you legal advice.
|
Thu May 18, 2017 4:04 pm |
|
|
Benja455
Site Supporter
Location: White Center Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 6489
|
I got mine around the time that 594 passed - maybe afterwards. I've been using it the entire time. No fuss, no muss.
I'd rather see a CPL exemption.
|
Thu May 18, 2017 4:34 pm |
|
|
velillen
Location: Wyoming Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 Posts: 981
|
It still worked with some vendors online. Plus the discounts from some vendors (brownells being one) paid for it in savings.
But glad i guess that its "official" now
|
Thu May 18, 2017 4:52 pm |
|
|
Pablo
Site Supporter
Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28177
Real Name: Ace Winky
|
Benja455 wrote: I'd rather see a CPL exemption. This.
_________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?
Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
|
Thu May 18, 2017 5:45 pm |
|
|
ANZAC
Site Supporter
Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251
|
There's no evidence C&R didn't work since 594 passed. Just a bunch of out of state dealers who weren't sure about it.
|
Thu May 18, 2017 5:53 pm |
|
|
Sinus211
Site Moderator
Location: Marysville Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 Posts: 13503
Real Name: Mike
|
Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.
_________________Licensed/Bonded/Insured Hardwood Floor Installer/Finisher http://www.hardwoodfloorsnw.com/
|
Thu May 18, 2017 7:37 pm |
|
|
ANZAC
Site Supporter
Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251
|
sinus211 wrote: Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side. There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo. I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption. But having the extra language won't hurt.
|
Thu May 18, 2017 9:52 pm |
|
|
usrifle
Site Supporter
Location: RENTON Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 Posts: 20771
Real Name: John
|
ANZAC wrote: There's no evidence C&R didn't work since 594 passed. Just a bunch of out of state dealers who weren't sure about it. There are no examples of a dealer accepting it since 594 either...whether in state or out of state. Plenty of examples of dealers who wouldn't though.
_________________ Mr. Q wrote: so basically, if you have to smoke some asshole, make sure they become fertilizer and then Bounce? got it.
Guntrader wrote: Huh, maybe I was an asshole.
NRA Member/RSO SAF 5 Year Donor GOA Member
|
Thu May 18, 2017 10:26 pm |
|
|
gunblaster
Location: Puyallup Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 Posts: 570
|
ANZAC wrote: sinus211 wrote: Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side. There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo. I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption. But having the extra language won't hurt. Once again it looks as though Aznak is full of beans. The devil is in the details; the exemption provided in RCW 9.41.113 applies to “licensed dealers” . The definition of “licensed dealer” is provided in RCW 9.41.010 as follows: (13) "Licensed dealer" means a person who is federally licensed under 18 USC Sec. 923(a).
C&R licenses are in 18 USC Sec 923( b). So the exemption in state law did NOT apply to C&R license holders. The language that becomes effective in July fixes that. http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.113http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.010https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/923
|
Thu May 18, 2017 11:13 pm |
|
|
usrifle
Site Supporter
Location: RENTON Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 Posts: 20771
Real Name: John
|
Thanks for digging into that Gunblaster, ANZAC wrote: sinus211 wrote: Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side. There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo. I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption. But having the extra language won't hurt. Apparently the extra language was necessary.
_________________ Mr. Q wrote: so basically, if you have to smoke some asshole, make sure they become fertilizer and then Bounce? got it.
Guntrader wrote: Huh, maybe I was an asshole.
NRA Member/RSO SAF 5 Year Donor GOA Member
|
Thu May 18, 2017 11:34 pm |
|
|
MadPick
Site Admin
Location: Renton, WA Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 Posts: 52030
Real Name: Steve
|
gunblaster wrote: ANZAC wrote: sinus211 wrote: Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side. There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo. I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption. But having the extra language won't hurt. Once again it looks as though Aznak is full of beans. The devil is in the details; the exemption provided in RCW 9.41.113 applies to “licensed dealers” . The definition of “licensed dealer” is provided in RCW 9.41.010 as follows: (13) "Licensed dealer" means a person who is federally licensed under 18 USC Sec. 923(a).
C&R licenses are in 18 USC Sec 923( b). So the exemption in state law did NOT apply to C&R license holders. The language that becomes effective in July fixes that. http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.113http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.010https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/923Yes, it's true that C&R holders are not "licensed dealers" but there is more to the story, and ANZAC is correct about that. We've discussed it in multiple threads, and we don't need to rehash it again here. sreyemj wrote: I suppose I should be grateful... it's difficult.
_________________SteveBenefactor Life Member, National Rifle AssociationLife Member, Second Amendment FoundationPatriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of AmericaLife Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsLegal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy CoalitionMember, NAGR/NFGRPlease support the organizations that support all of us.Leave it cleaner than you found it.
|
Sat May 20, 2017 4:43 pm |
|
|
|