Curio and Relic licenses work again!

[thefuryoffire]

Starting 7/23:

http://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillN ... &Year=2017

The i-594 "improvements" bill has passed!

[sreyemj]

I suppose I should be grateful... it's difficult.

[DGM33]

I guess I should look into a C&R license.

[leadcounsel]

Well we can complain about 594, but that this is clarified and beneficial is fantastic.

I let mine lapse, but may re-get one....

[Benja455]

I got mine around the time that 594 passed - maybe afterwards. I've been using it the entire time. No fuss, no muss.

I'd rather see a CPL exemption.

[velillen]

It still worked with some vendors online. Plus the discounts from some vendors (brownells being one) paid for it in savings.

But glad i guess that its "official" now

[Pablo]

I'd rather see a CPL exemption.

This.

[ANZAC]

There's no evidence C&R didn't work since 594 passed. Just a bunch of out of state dealers who weren't sure about it.

[Sinus211]

Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.

[ANZAC]

Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.

There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo.
I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption.
But having the extra language won't hurt.

[usrifle]

There's no evidence C&R didn't work since 594 passed. Just a bunch of out of state dealers who weren't sure about it.

There are no examples of a dealer accepting it since 594 either...whether in state or out of state.
Plenty of examples of dealers who wouldn't though.

[gunblaster]

Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.

There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo.
I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption.
But having the extra language won't hurt.

Once again it looks as though Aznak is full of beans.

The devil is in the details; the exemption provided in RCW 9.41.113 applies to “licensed dealers” . The definition of “licensed dealer” is provided in RCW 9.41.010 as follows: (13) "Licensed dealer" means a person who is federally licensed under 18 USC Sec. 923(a).


C&R licenses are in 18 USC Sec 923(b). So the exemption in state law did NOT apply to C&R license holders. The language that becomes effective in July fixes that.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.113
http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.010
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/923

[usrifle]

Thanks for digging into that Gunblaster,

Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.

There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo.
I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption.
But having the extra language won't hurt.

Apparently the extra language was necessary.

[MadPick]

Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.

There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo.
I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption.
But having the extra language won't hurt.

Once again it looks as though Aznak is full of beans.

The devil is in the details; the exemption provided in RCW 9.41.113 applies to “licensed dealers” . The definition of “licensed dealer” is provided in RCW 9.41.010 as follows: (13) "Licensed dealer" means a person who is federally licensed under 18 USC Sec. 923(a).


C&R licenses are in 18 USC Sec 923(b). So the exemption in state law did NOT apply to C&R license holders. The language that becomes effective in July fixes that.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.113
http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.010
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/923

Yes, it's true that C&R holders are not "licensed dealers" but there is more to the story, and ANZAC is correct about that. We've discussed it in multiple threads, and we don't need to rehash it again here.

I suppose I should be grateful... it's difficult.