|
|
|
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 12:46 pm
|
Forum rules
Nothing contained in this section shall be construed as legal advice. All members and guests are advised to perform due diligence in regards to laws and legal actions.
Has anybody been prosecuted for 594
Author |
Message |
TINCANBANDIT
Site Supporter
Location: Mohave Valley Arizona Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 Posts: 13371
Real Name: Casey
|
What could you possibly do with a firearm that would result in the harm to another person that isn't already illegal?
Laws on to of laws do nothing to prevent something that is already against the law...
If these people (the felons everyone is trying to prevent getting a gun) are so dangerous, why did we let them out of jail?
_________________Actor portrayal, Action figures sold separately, You must be at least this tall to ride, Individual results may vary, Sales tax not included, All models are over 18 years of age, upon approval of credit, Quantities are limited while supplies last, Some restrictions apply, Not available with other offers, At participating locations only, Void where prohibited, Above terms subject to change without notice, Patent pending.See my blog: http://tincanbandit.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:15 am |
|
|
jackass
Site Supporter
Location: Burien Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 Posts: 5882
|
I went to a gun club meeting right before I-594 was voted in and the coin club was there, closing shop. They found out that I was with the gun club and the gun owners in the coin club were talking the merits of "if it saves one life". So I disagree, I think the gun owners were divided on I-594, something to our detriment. Gun owners were united when Initiative 676 tried to get rammed thru, the so called "Trigger Lock initiative": https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Hand ... _676_(1997) Gun owners were divided with the background check issue, even with public proponents of the 2A.
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:51 am |
|
|
AR15L
Site Supporter
Location: Nampa, Idaho Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 19467
Real Name: Rick
|
jackass wrote: I went to a gun club meeting right before I-594 was voted in and the coin club was there, closing shop. They found out that I was with the gun club and the gun owners in the coin club were talking the merits of "if it saves one life". So I disagree, I think the gun owners were divided on I-594, something to our detriment. Gun owners were united when Initiative 676 tried to get rammed thru, the so called "Trigger Lock initiative": https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Hand ... _676_(1997) Gun owners were divided with the background check issue, even with public proponents of the 2A. Background checks are one thing. 594 is something out of Satan's book.
_________________ ‘What’s the point of being a citizen if an illegal gets all the benefits’
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:07 am |
|
|
Pablo
Site Supporter
Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28187
Real Name: Ace Winky
|
Jackass I think in general you are correct before the election. I probably should have said after the election and gun owners who are even semi conscious what this steaming pile of shit is all about.
_________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?
Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:15 am |
|
|
Hunter399
Location: Spokane Joined: Fri Dec 2, 2016 Posts: 32
|
What gets me is why can't they make it affordable,like 10 dollars max.Every place you go has a different price.Of make them free or something,that's the biggest problem.
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:20 am |
|
|
jackass
Site Supporter
Location: Burien Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 Posts: 5882
|
Pablo wrote: Jackass I think in general you are correct before the election. I probably should have said after the election and gun owners who are even semi conscious what this steaming pile of shit is all about. No prob, I agree we ought to be one monolithic group in these sense fighting like a dog for his dog dish.
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:22 am |
|
|
Pablo
Site Supporter
Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28187
Real Name: Ace Winky
|
Some clowns on this very site said they would be local, easy and almost free. SOBs cannot be trusted.
_________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?
Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:23 am |
|
|
AR15L
Site Supporter
Location: Nampa, Idaho Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 19467
Real Name: Rick
|
Hunter399 wrote: What gets me is why can't they make it affordable,like 10 dollars max.Every place you go has a different price.Of make them free or something,that's the biggest problem. Should of written it so the BGC HAD to be done at the police station... for free... no appt. needed... and make them stay open until 9pm every night!
_________________ ‘What’s the point of being a citizen if an illegal gets all the benefits’
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:24 am |
|
|
Hunter399
Location: Spokane Joined: Fri Dec 2, 2016 Posts: 32
|
AR15L wrote: Hunter399 wrote: What gets me is why can't they make it affordable,like 10 dollars max.Every place you go has a different price.Of make them free or something,that's the biggest problem. Should of written it so the BGC HAD to be done at the police station... for free... no appt. needed... and make them stay open until 9pm every night! I agree , they should of written it in the bill.
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:29 am |
|
|
jackass
Site Supporter
Location: Burien Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 Posts: 5882
|
Pablo wrote: Some clowns on this very site said they would be local, easy and almost free. SOBs cannot be trusted. Like our healthcare. "You can keep your doctor".
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:30 am |
|
|
jackass
Site Supporter
Location: Burien Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 Posts: 5882
|
Hunter399 wrote: AR15L wrote: Hunter399 wrote: What gets me is why can't they make it affordable,like 10 dollars max.Every place you go has a different price.Of make them free or something,that's the biggest problem. Should of written it so the BGC HAD to be done at the police station... for free... no appt. needed... and make them stay open until 9pm every night! I agree , they should of written it in the bill. The OPTION of having a background check done at 'a' police station, not necessarily your nearest one, during normal business hours. However, that would involve a cost to the taxpayer they would not want to incur. It is telling that the bill did not mention the true expense, since a dispriviledged minority would have to pay it.
|
Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:33 am |
|
|
gunblaster
Location: Puyallup Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 Posts: 570
|
ANZAC wrote: A better question is how many prohibited people were denied from getting a gun vs before.... (we don't know that number either) The answer to that question is zero, or as close to zero as makes no difference. You don't have to know the actual value to know that the result is meaningless! A better question is will supporters of 594 that believe it has or will have an effect on scumbags ever get a clue as to reality. Probable answer: No.
|
Fri Apr 07, 2017 2:26 pm |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|