WaGuns.org

Page 1 of 2

[ 30 posts ]

Go to page 1, 2 Next

I-594 and CPL holders

Author	Message
victoriassecret Location: WA Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 Posts: 52	I-594 and CPL holders I apologize if this has been posted, I couldn't find anything on it, but according to this list https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/permanent-brady-permit-chart, WA CPL holders can skip the background check requirements of the Brady law. But, I am wondering under I-594 if a CPL will work for private sales too? I'm guessing not
Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:04 pm

Shonmow Site Supporter Location: Shoreline, WA Joined: Tue May 10, 2016 Posts: 41	Re: I-594 and CPL holders Since initiative 594 was enacted a background check is required on all sale of firearms be it private or from a dealer. There are a lot of gun stores throughout the Puget Sound, and Washington that will facilitate the paperwork for a fee usually around $40 I Hope this helps _________________ ~John Silent Majority Foundation Armed Citizens' Legal Defense Network Member Second Amendment Foundation
Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:23 pm

ANZAC Site Supporter Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251	Re: I-594 and CPL holders victoriassecret wrote: I apologize if this has been posted, I couldn't find anything on it, but according to this list https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/permanent-brady-permit-chart, WA CPL holders can skip the background check requirements of the Brady law. But, I am wondering under I-594 if a CPL will work for private sales too? I'm guessing not No, there's no exemption for CPL holders for private sales. You need to go to an FFL and the FFL follows the process: viewtopic.php?f=47&t=76956
Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:48 pm

Pablo Site Supporter Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28178 Real Name: Ace Winky	Re: I-594 and CPL holders ANZAC wrote: No, there's no exemption for CPL holders for private sales. And that my friends was very much on purpose. _________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck? Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:52 pm

Benja455 Site Supporter Location: White Center Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 6489	Re: I-594 and CPL holders Pablo wrote: ANZAC wrote: No, there's no exemption for CPL holders for private sales. And that my friends was very much on purpose. Yep, it's not about safety - it's about making gun ownership a huge hassle.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:55 pm

jdhbulseye Site Supporter Location: Rochester, WA Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 Posts: 3761 Real Name: Mr. Idgaf	Re: I-594 and CPL holders Benja455 wrote: Pablo wrote: ANZAC wrote: No, there's no exemption for CPL holders for private sales. And that my friends was very much on purpose. Yep, it's not about safety - it's about making gun ownership a huge hassle. Psssst. DO NOT tell ANZAC this. _________________ MadPick wrote: Without penetration data, the pics aren't of much use. Spoiler: show "Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm -- but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves." – T.S. Eliot "The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction." - St. George Tucker A careful definition of words would destroy half the agenda of the political left and scrutinizing evidence would destroy the other half. - Thomas Sowell "To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding." - Jeff Snyder Personal weapons are what raised mankind out of the mud, and the rifle is the queen of personal weapons. The possession of a good rifle, as well as the skill to use it well, truly makes a man the monarch of all he surveys. It realizes the ancient dream of the Jovian thunderbolt, and as such it is the embodiment of personal power. For this reason it exercises a curious influence over the minds of most men, and in its best examples it constitutes an object of affection unmatched by any other inanimate object. Jeff Cooper 1997 The Art of the Rifle Page 1. Spoiler: show SUGGEST CASE BE SUBMITTED ON APPELLANT'S BRIEF. UNABLE TO OBTAIN ANY MONEY FROM CLIENTS TO BE PRESENT & ARGUE BRIEF. The defense attorney's telegram to the clerk of the Supreme Court, March 29, 1939, in re United States. v. Miller. You don't need to go to Law School to understand the constitutional implications of that. “You can’t cut the throat of every cocksucker whose character it would improve.” Spoiler: show cityslicker wrote: I don't want to be told that I can't remove the tree by some tree-hugging pole smoker from the eat-a-dick foundation/Olympia/King County.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 6:14 pm

ANZAC Site Supporter Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251	Re: I-594 and CPL holders Pablo wrote: ANZAC wrote: No, there's no exemption for CPL holders for private sales. And that my friends was very much on purpose. You're assuming way too much.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 6:46 pm

victoriassecret Location: WA Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 Posts: 52	Re: I-594 and CPL holders Thanks guys. I even asked a Kitsap County Sheriff's deputy about this and he said he assumed a CPL was sufficient. Pretty funny that LE can't even comprehend the BS of the law
Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:00 pm

ANZAC Site Supporter Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251	Re: I-594 and CPL holders victoriassecret wrote: Thanks guys. I even asked a Kitsap County Sheriff's deputy about this and he said he assumed a CPL was sufficient. Pretty funny that LE can't even comprehend the BS of the law Cops are always most familiar with the laws they encounter most (laws that have been around for a while with frequent offenders). I'm always pointing stuff out our deputies don't know, especially about guns.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:02 pm

Pablo Site Supporter Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28178 Real Name: Ace Winky	Re: I-594 and CPL holders ANZAC wrote: Pablo wrote: ANZAC wrote: No, there's no exemption for CPL holders for private sales. And that my friends was very much on purpose. You're assuming way too much. Oh I know. Sandy Brown, Fascatelli and the like. They said it. They could give a rat for CPL holders. I try to pay attention to these things. It IS frustrating, and that aspect got no traction. I am bringing it up. I asked Dino Rossi: Quote: I am wondering as a 2nd Amendment supporter, if you might support a bill to allow a 594 exemption for CPL holders for private sales. Both parties have a current CPL (which means background check already) - why should they have to pay the fees and the huge hassle of going to an FFL? _________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck? Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:11 pm

Benja455 Site Supporter Location: White Center Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 6489	Re: I-594 and CPL holders ANZAC wrote: Pablo wrote: ANZAC wrote: No, there's no exemption for CPL holders for private sales. And that my friends was very much on purpose. You're assuming way too much. Au contraire mon frere...he assumes nothing - the intentions of 594's authors/financial backers were quite clear.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:12 pm

victoriassecret Location: WA Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 Posts: 52	Re: I-594 and CPL holders ANZAC wrote: victoriassecret wrote: Thanks guys. I even asked a Kitsap County Sheriff's deputy about this and he said he assumed a CPL was sufficient. Pretty funny that LE can't even comprehend the BS of the law Cops are always most familiar with the laws they encounter most (laws that have been around for a while with frequent offenders). I'm always pointing stuff out our deputies don't know, especially about guns. True, the only laws he seemed familiar with were firearm discharge ordinances and OC/CC. I was on a ridealong with him, so we really got to talkin'.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:14 pm

golddigger14s Site Supporter Location: Faxon, OK Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 Posts: 17818 Real Name: Chuck	Re: I-594 and CPL holders Police officers can carry concealed with their dept. ID, but still need a WA CPL to buy a HG and take it home the same day. Get a CPL everybody. _________________ "The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." Thomas Jefferson "Evil often triumphs, but never conquers." Joseph Roux
Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:49 pm

mislabeled Site Supporter Location: N-Sno Joined: Thu Oct 3, 2013 Posts: 4015	Re: I-594 and CPL holders victoriassecret wrote: ANZAC wrote: victoriassecret wrote: Thanks guys. I even asked a Kitsap County Sheriff's deputy about this and he said he assumed a CPL was sufficient. Pretty funny that LE can't even comprehend the BS of the law Cops are always most familiar with the laws they encounter most (laws that have been around for a while with frequent offenders). I'm always pointing stuff out our deputies don't know, especially about guns. True, the only laws he seemed familiar with were firearm discharge ordinances and OC/CC. I was on a ridealong with him, so we really got to talkin'. Some LEOs have gone on record as saying 594 is such a low priority as to be nearly non-existent. Maybe some of them see a CPL as more meaningful than a law that is being basically ignored. _________________ "Hmmm. I've been looking for a way to serve the community that incorporates my violence." -- Leela
Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:01 pm

ANZAC Site Supporter Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251	Re: I-594 and CPL holders Benja455 wrote: ANZAC wrote: Pablo wrote: ANZAC wrote: No, there's no exemption for CPL holders for private sales. And that my friends was very much on purpose. You're assuming way too much. Au contraire mon frere...he assumes nothing - the intentions of 594's authors/financial backers were quite clear. Actually I quizzed the "authors" on a variety of points (things that could have been better) and was told to GTFO because they had "top men" working on it. There were many things they clearly did NOT understand.
Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:07 pm

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Page 1 of 2

[ 30 posts ]

Go to page 1, 2 Next

Forum rules

I-594 and CPL holders

Who is online