Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:14 am
Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:55 am
kf7mjf wrote:I thought FMJ's weren't legal for hunting? It's been a while since I looked at the regs though.
Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:47 am
Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:18 am
Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:06 pm
dreadi wrote:Most people aren't going to take you seriously unless you improve your writing skills. Also, no one is saying "no to the future of hunting." by not supporting .223 How many potential hunters in the state of Washington are missing out because they can't use .223 for deer?
Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:14 pm
Hunter399 wrote:dreadi wrote:Most people aren't going to take you seriously unless you improve your writing skills. Also, no one is saying "no to the future of hunting." by not supporting .223 How many potential hunters in the state of Washington are missing out because they can't use .223 for deer?
Thanks for taking me to school on my English skills ,i see people changing there minds cause of that.
Well I still do not agree with it.The more people you have hunting,man,woman,child,will give you better support in the future ,later down the road .And help against gun control laws,having a light reason to keep your ar15 for a sporting use.
Can you understand my English , or is it still to complex for you to figure out.
Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:33 pm
dreadi wrote:Most people aren't going to take you seriously unless you improve your writing skills. Also, no one is saying "no to the future of hunting." by not supporting .223 How many potential hunters in the state of Washington are missing out because they can't use .223 for deer?
Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:35 pm
Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:11 pm
Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:28 pm
Hunter399 wrote:If you can watch this , And still tell me no.Then your lost.
https://youtu.be/5UknRey6BLA
Mule deer doe in Idaho,216 yards,55 grain power soft point.
But ya I guess it won't kill mule deer , your all right ,i guess I'm sorry for trying to tell ya otherwise.
Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:38 pm
jdhbulseye wrote:Hunter399 wrote:If you can watch this , And still tell me no.Then your lost.
https://youtu.be/5UknRey6BLA
Mule deer doe in Idaho,216 yards,55 grain power soft point.
But ya I guess it won't kill mule deer , your all right ,i guess I'm sorry for trying to tell ya otherwise.
you're*
Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:53 pm
Hunter399 wrote:jdhbulseye wrote:Hunter399 wrote:If you can watch this , And still tell me no.Then your lost.
https://youtu.be/5UknRey6BLA
Mule deer doe in Idaho,216 yards,55 grain power soft point.
But ya I guess it won't kill mule deer , your all right ,i guess I'm sorry for trying to tell ya otherwise.
you're*
You're*
Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:35 pm
Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:53 pm
chasehooks wrote:I still disagree for some of the same reasons that I would discuss with parents coming in to buy their kids a .243 for their first deer rifle: Since you live in Washington do you think your son or daughter is ever going to want to shoot something bigger then a deer or coyote? Do you think they may ever want to hunt bear or elk down the road? If yes, you may want to get something like a 7mm-08 so you don't have to buy another rifle in a year or two. Don't get me wrong my first rifle was a Model 700 .243 and I loved it. But I lived in Nebraska and a deer was the biggest thing I'd ever see (OK, NOW they have elk). Some people are only going to hunt deer. Some people could harvest a moose with a perfectly placed .22LR shot (right behind the ear, at least that's what our fishing guide told us up in Canada 50 years ago). However the chances of imperfect shots by the majority of hunters and the wasted wildlife that results is, in my opinion, the reason it shouldn't change. With a 7mm Mag I've had game drop in it's tracks and I've also had elk take 2 well placed shots and keep going, but not as far as it would have gone with a less lethal round. But hey, you've got a 30 round mag so who needs to be accurate. Just spray the woods! That's one of the positive things about hunters with a single shot! Make the first one count like its the only one in the gun!!!
Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:29 pm
Hunter399 wrote:chasehooks wrote:I still disagree for some of the same reasons that I would discuss with parents coming in to buy their kids a .243 for their first deer rifle: Since you live in Washington do you think your son or daughter is ever going to want to shoot something bigger then a deer or coyote? Do you think they may ever want to hunt bear or elk down the road? If yes, you may want to get something like a 7mm-08 so you don't have to buy another rifle in a year or two. Don't get me wrong my first rifle was a Model 700 .243 and I loved it. But I lived in Nebraska and a deer was the biggest thing I'd ever see (OK, NOW they have elk). Some people are only going to hunt deer. Some people could harvest a moose with a perfectly placed .22LR shot (right behind the ear, at least that's what our fishing guide told us up in Canada 50 years ago). However the chances of imperfect shots by the majority of hunters and the wasted wildlife that results is, in my opinion, the reason it shouldn't change. With a 7mm Mag I've had game drop in it's tracks and I've also had elk take 2 well placed shots and keep going, but not as far as it would have gone with a less lethal round. But hey, you've got a 30 round mag so who needs to be accurate. Just spray the woods! That's one of the positive things about hunters with a single shot! Make the first one count like its the only one in the gun!!!
Ya you can save me the sales pitch, now 243 not big enough.Some hunters can do it with a smaller caliber,some can't.It's not how big your tool is,its how you use it
How many archer gut shot animals every year,there's gonna be run off deer ,if you like it or not.