Gun store Shooting Locations It is currently Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:04 pm

Rules Brads Guns RA I5 Guns & Ammo Killer Innovations WAC
WGO Chat Room Rehv Arms LPG Pintos
Gear COUNTYLINE WCA Fortis 2A Ind.
Calendar



Forum rules


Nothing contained in this section shall be construed as legal advice. All members and guests are advised to perform due diligence in regards to laws and legal actions.



Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
 Curio and Relic licenses work again! 
Author Message
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Fairwood, WA
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013
Posts: 862
Real Name: Jon
Starting 7/23:

http://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillN ... &Year=2017

The i-594 "improvements" bill has passed!


Thu May 18, 2017 3:47 pm
Profile
User avatar

Location: Tacoma/Yakima
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012
Posts: 905
I suppose I should be grateful... it's difficult.


Thu May 18, 2017 3:56 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Renton/Kent
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 1278
Real Name: Jacy
I guess I should look into a C&R license.


Thu May 18, 2017 4:02 pm
Profile
Online
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Spanaway, WA
Joined: Sat Sep 6, 2014
Posts: 3528
Well we can complain about 594, but that this is clarified and beneficial is fantastic.

I let mine lapse, but may re-get one....

_________________
I defend the 2A. US Army Combat Veteran and Paratrooper: OIF x4. BSM and MSM recipient. NRA Lifetime. I'm a lawyer, but have not offered you legal advice.


Thu May 18, 2017 4:04 pm
Profile
Site Moderator
User avatar
Site Moderator

Location: Ballard
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011
Posts: 6035
Real Name: Ben (obviously)
I got mine around the time that 594 passed - maybe afterwards. I've been using it the entire time. No fuss, no muss.

I'd rather see a CPL exemption.

_________________
"Those who 'abjure' violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf." - George Orwell (1945)

Looking for an inexpensive/easy place to transfer your gun legally? Check out this list of FFLs!


Thu May 18, 2017 4:34 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Location: Port Orchard
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012
Posts: 603
It still worked with some vendors online. Plus the discounts from some vendors (brownells being one) paid for it in savings.

But glad i guess that its "official" now


Thu May 18, 2017 4:52 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Duvall
Joined: Sat Jan 5, 2013
Posts: 10315
Real Name: Ace Tenemem Reroader
Benja455 wrote:
I'd rather see a CPL exemption.


This.

_________________
Charlie don't surf for his hamburger Momma


Thu May 18, 2017 5:45 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Unincorporated King County
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012
Posts: 7059
There's no evidence C&R didn't work since 594 passed. Just a bunch of out of state dealers who weren't sure about it.


Thu May 18, 2017 5:53 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Lynnwood
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012
Posts: 7548
Real Name: Mike
Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.

_________________
Licensed/Bonded/Insured Hardwood Floor Installer/Finisher http://www.hardwoodfloorsnw.com/


Thu May 18, 2017 7:37 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Unincorporated King County
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012
Posts: 7059
sinus211 wrote:
Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.


There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo.
I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption.
But having the extra language won't hurt.


Thu May 18, 2017 9:52 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: RENTON
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011
Posts: 7099
Real Name: John
ANZAC wrote:
There's no evidence C&R didn't work since 594 passed. Just a bunch of out of state dealers who weren't sure about it.



There are no examples of a dealer accepting it since 594 either...whether in state or out of state.
Plenty of examples of dealers who wouldn't though.

_________________
NRA RSO


Thu May 18, 2017 10:26 pm
Profile
User avatar

Location: Puyallup
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012
Posts: 229
ANZAC wrote:
sinus211 wrote:
Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.


There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo.
I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption.
But having the extra language won't hurt.

Once again it looks as though Aznak is full of beans.

The devil is in the details; the exemption provided in RCW 9.41.113 applies to “licensed dealers” . The definition of “licensed dealer” is provided in RCW 9.41.010 as follows: (13) "Licensed dealer" means a person who is federally licensed under 18 USC Sec. 923(a).


C&R licenses are in 18 USC Sec 923(b). So the exemption in state law did NOT apply to C&R license holders. The language that becomes effective in July fixes that.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.113
http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.010
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/923


Thu May 18, 2017 11:13 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: RENTON
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011
Posts: 7099
Real Name: John
Thanks for digging into that Gunblaster, :bow:
ANZAC wrote:
sinus211 wrote:
Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.


There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo.
I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption.
But having the extra language won't hurt.


Apparently the extra language was necessary.

_________________
NRA RSO


Thu May 18, 2017 11:34 pm
Profile
Online
Site Admin
User avatar
Site Admin

Location: Renton, WA
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011
Posts: 31489
Real Name: Steve
gunblaster wrote:
ANZAC wrote:
sinus211 wrote:
Something something something...defend 594...something something something...dark side.


There was already language that said if a "specific federal exemption" existed, then no problemo.
I've previously posted the section of the USC that details that specific federal exemption.
But having the extra language won't hurt.

Once again it looks as though Aznak is full of beans.

The devil is in the details; the exemption provided in RCW 9.41.113 applies to “licensed dealers” . The definition of “licensed dealer” is provided in RCW 9.41.010 as follows: (13) "Licensed dealer" means a person who is federally licensed under 18 USC Sec. 923(a).


C&R licenses are in 18 USC Sec 923(b). So the exemption in state law did NOT apply to C&R license holders. The language that becomes effective in July fixes that.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.113
http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.010
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/923


Yes, it's true that C&R holders are not "licensed dealers" but there is more to the story, and ANZAC is correct about that. We've discussed it in multiple threads, and we don't need to rehash it again here.

sreyemj wrote:
I suppose I should be grateful... it's difficult.


:plusone:

_________________
Steve

Benefactor Life Member, National Rifle Association
Life Member, Second Amendment Foundation
Life Member, Gun Owners of America
Life Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Please support the organizations that support all of us.

Leave it cleaner than you found it.


Sat May 20, 2017 4:43 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum



Rent Me Pintos NRA SAF CCKRBA
Aldersons UPAMMO


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.
[ Time : 1.235s | 17 Queries | GZIP : On ]