Gun store Shooting Locations It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 5:22 am



Rules WGO Chat Room Gear Rent Me Shield NRA SAF CCKRBA
Calendar




Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
 KOMO: Woman dies following shooting at Seattle homeless camp 
Author Message
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: White Center
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011
Posts: 6489
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Unid ... 18661.html

Quote:
SEATTLE - A woman was shot and later died after an unknown suspect opened fire on 8th Avenue and Yesler Way overnight in Seattle, Detective Patrick Michaude with Seattle Police said. The victim was inside a tent located in a small encampment of homeless people around 1:45 a.m., when someone reached inside with a gun and opened fire, witnesses said.


While this is an extremely tragic story...sadly, my first thought was "I wonder if the shooter passed a 594 background check." :facepalm2:


Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:57 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar
Site Admin

Location: Olympia, WA
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011
Posts: 38307
Real Name: Dan
I read that yesterday. Just opened fire. Horrible situation.

I too thought of the 594 shtick. Sucks to read the news now with the 594 monkey on your back.


Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:01 am
Profile WWW
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: White Center
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011
Posts: 6489
If they ever catch the guilty party, I suspect they will find that the shooter is a heavy drug user and/or mentally ill and either:

A) Stole the gun (without a background check).

or

B) Acquired the gun legally with a background check which didn't flag his/her mental illness.


Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:04 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012
Posts: 7251
Benja455 wrote:
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Unidentified-woman-dies-after-shooting-in-Seattle-homeless-camp-296318661.html

Quote:
SEATTLE - A woman was shot and later died after an unknown suspect opened fire on 8th Avenue and Yesler Way overnight in Seattle, Detective Patrick Michaude with Seattle Police said. The victim was inside a tent located in a small encampment of homeless people around 1:45 a.m., when someone reached inside with a gun and opened fire, witnesses said.


While this is an extremely tragic story...sadly, my first thought was "I wonder if the shooter passed a 594 background check." :facepalm2:


A better question is how did they obtain the gun. It could have been stolen.


Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:05 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: White Center
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011
Posts: 6489
ANZAC wrote:
A better question is how did they obtain the gun. It could have been stolen.


Image


Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:08 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Lacey/Olympia/JBLM
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011
Posts: 3111
Real Name: Marco
Very tragic of course. Apparently even with the 594. a new Chief of Police in Seattle and new promotions within the SPD, this tragic event still occurred.


594= :thumbsdown:

_________________
"Dedication, perseverance, commitment and tenacity are the traits you will
find in those who finish and achieve their dreams."


There are times when the situation as it occurs, dictates the course of actions that follow.

"I stand for the National Anthem, always have, always will"

On days like this, I often wonder what Gary Gordon and Randy Shughart would do...


Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:06 am
Profile
Online
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: WA/MT
Joined: Thu Sep 6, 2012
Posts: 8285
If only the criminal element would learn to follow all these laws and rules that makes us safer. Wouldn't it be great?

Maybe we should endorse and pass a law making it illegal to break the law. That should do it.

_________________
Rara Temporum Felicitas Ubi Sentire Quae Velis Et Quod Velis Dicere Licet. ― Tacitus
"Well, nobody's perfect." ― Osgood Fielding III


Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:20 am
Profile
User avatar

Location: Seattle
Joined: Thu Feb 7, 2013
Posts: 694
dan360 wrote:

Maybe we should endorse and pass a law making it illegal to break the law. That should do it.



The sad thing is, you could probably get a majority of the voters to approve such a referendum.

Off topic, but the referendum system itself is the problem. Remember, we have had 230 years of peaceful prosperity in this country (excepting the war over equality, of course), because the founders had the great wisdom to choose a republican government over democracy. We are (or, should be) a society governed by laws (res public), limited government, natural rights of men (stated or not). When you allow a simple majority to determine the laws, you end up with tyranny--"tyranny of the small majority." This is exactly what I-594 represents.

Res public. A society of laws. Inviolable rights of men (to freely practice religion, defend themselves, gather peacefully, speak their minds, yada yada). NOT democracy and referenda.

Rant over.

_________________
RENCORP wrote:
After all, politics is porn too, only without the happy ending.


Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:32 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Tri -Cities
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013
Posts: 2798
Real Name: David
pdrake wrote:
dan360 wrote:

Maybe we should endorse and pass a law making it illegal to break the law. That should do it.



The sad thing is, you could probably get a majority of the voters to approve such a referendum.



Wouldn't even have to disguise it in 18 pages of crap.


Sun Mar 15, 2015 6:07 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Midwest
Joined: Thu Oct 2, 2014
Posts: 8645
pdrake wrote:
dan360 wrote:

Maybe we should endorse and pass a law making it illegal to break the law. That should do it.



The sad thing is, you could probably get a majority of the voters to approve such a referendum.

Off topic, but the referendum system itself is the problem. Remember, we have had 230 years of peaceful prosperity in this country (excepting the war over equality, of course), because the founders had the great wisdom to choose a republican government over democracy. We are (or, should be) a society governed by laws (res public), limited government, natural rights of men (stated or not). When you allow a simple majority to determine the laws, you end up with tyranny--"tyranny of the small majority." This is exactly what I-594 represents.

Res public. A society of laws. Inviolable rights of men (to freely practice religion, defend themselves, gather peacefully, speak their minds, yada yada). NOT democracy and referenda.

Rant over.

:plusone:

_________________
Massivedesign wrote:
I am thinking of a number somewhere between none of and your business.


Tue Mar 17, 2015 1:57 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 10 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum



Rules WGO Chat Room Gear Rent Me NRA SAF CCKRBA
Calendar


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.
[ Time : 0.682s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]