Switch to full style
Let's talk about guns!
Post a reply

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:56 pm

Yeah the federal level was what I was more wondering about.
The topic came up along with the firearm vs pistol shit and all the random weirdo laws.

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:54 pm

usrifle wrote:
RocketScott wrote:That's a different issue, parts assembled into a rifle.

Going back to my first post: if the hook is ground off it would be ok to use on both the state and the federal level.

Possession of hammers should be ok given that the M16 hammer is not designed to be exclusively used in a machine gun.


Try to order one and have it sent to WA.
:popcorn:

Why would you even try? Semantics..


You’re still not answering the question

I’m not Rix (slightly taller yet somehow less sexy) so I don’t know why he asked.

I figured he had a reason for asking beyond semantics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:57 pm

RocketScott wrote:
usrifle wrote:
RocketScott wrote:That's a different issue, parts assembled into a rifle.

Going back to my first post: if the hook is ground off it would be ok to use on both the state and the federal level.

Possession of hammers should be ok given that the M16 hammer is not designed to be exclusively used in a machine gun.


Try to order one and have it sent to WA.
:popcorn:

Why would you even try? Semantics..


You’re still not answering the question

I’m not Rix (slightly taller yet somehow less sexy) so I don’t know why he asked.

I figured he had a reason for asking beyond semantics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


He said because they're cheap. Real cheap.

And I agree with you. If it can be used and function in a SA rifle then it's not exclusively mfg'd for FA. Should be legal according to the letter of the law. Just another stupid law on the books that no one can understand and can be interpreted one way Mon-Sat and another way on Sun.

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Tue Dec 12, 2017 9:43 pm

sinus211 wrote:
RocketScott wrote:
usrifle wrote:
RocketScott wrote:That's a different issue, parts assembled into a rifle.

Going back to my first post: if the hook is ground off it would be ok to use on both the state and the federal level.

Possession of hammers should be ok given that the M16 hammer is not designed to be exclusively used in a machine gun.


Try to order one and have it sent to WA.
:popcorn:

Why would you even try? Semantics..


You’re still not answering the question

I’m not Rix (slightly taller yet somehow less sexy) so I don’t know why he asked.

I figured he had a reason for asking beyond semantics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


He said because they're cheap. Real cheap.

And I agree with you. If it can be used and function in a SA rifle then it's not exclusively mfg'd for FA. Should be legal according to the letter of the law. Just another stupid law on the books that no one can understand and can be interpreted one way Mon-Sat and another way on Sun.

Right. I can't find anything concrete, besides auto sear and registered MG.

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Tue Dec 12, 2017 9:48 pm

Rix86 wrote:Right. I can't find anything concrete, besides auto sear and registered MG.

Keep in mind though that "FA" parts are banned from shipping to WA. So it may be a moot point anyway

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:08 pm

sinus211 wrote:If it can be used and function in a SA rifle then it's not exclusively mfg'd for FA.

"Exclusively manufactured" speaks to intent, while "can be used and function in" speaks to potential. I would caution against conflating the two. The FA hammers are distinctly different in terms of their design, presumably because the manufacturer's intent is that they be used only in FA firearms. Just because they can be used in SA firearms doesn't mean that was what they were manufactured for. That's my 2 cents.

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:18 pm

Guns4Liberty wrote:
sinus211 wrote:If it can be used and function in a SA rifle then it's not exclusively mfg'd for FA.

"Exclusively manufactured" speaks to intent, while "can be used and function in" speaks to potential. I would caution against conflating the two. The FA hammers are distinctly different in terms of their design, presumably because the manufacturer's intent is that they be used only in FA firearms. Just because they can be used in SA firearms doesn't mean that was what they were manufactured for. That's my 2 cents.

Why you gotta piss in ma cornflakes brah???

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:35 pm

sinus211 wrote:
Rix86 wrote:Right. I can't find anything concrete, besides auto sear and registered MG.

Keep in mind though that "FA" parts are banned from shipping to WA. So it may be a moot point anyway

Yeah I haven't even looked that far yet.

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:45 am

sinus211 wrote:
Rix86 wrote:Right. I can't find anything concrete, besides auto sear and registered MG.

Keep in mind though that "FA" parts are banned from shipping to WA. So it may be a moot point anyway


You are right Mike. Parts warehouses and businesses will not ship FA parts to WA. You may be able to find someone who will, but that's again a Moot point.

RocketScott wrote:Many parts will work in an AR, therefor not exclusive to a machine gun.


That is true....But an M16 Hammer, Disconnector, Selector etc, is designed exclusively for a FA Weapon. While it will work perfectly in a Semi Auto, the same parts Designed Exclusively For a Semi Auto will not work in reverse.

Hence the issue and the States stance. You can argue it all you want, maybe find a FA hammer and grind the Hook off to save a few bucks, but it ain't worth it.

In this State, even Possession of FA parts could be Prosecuted.

You need a Cheap AR Hammer? I will Give you one. I'd even send it to you on my Dime Free.

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:18 am

sinus211 wrote:Why you gotta piss in ma cornflakes brah???

Because shitting in them would have been a step too far. :ffight:

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:04 pm

*coughs* I know nothing’s. *Kicks something under bed*

I know nothing

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:45 pm

usrifle wrote:
sinus211 wrote:
Rix86 wrote:Right. I can't find anything concrete, besides auto sear and registered MG.

Keep in mind though that "FA" parts are banned from shipping to WA. So it may be a moot point anyway


You are right Mike. Parts warehouses and businesses will not ship FA parts to WA. You may be able to find someone who will, but that's again a Moot point.

RocketScott wrote:Many parts will work in an AR, therefor not exclusive to a machine gun.


That is true....But an M16 Hammer, Disconnector, Selector etc, is designed exclusively for a FA Weapon. While it will work perfectly in a Semi Auto, the same parts Designed Exclusively For a Semi Auto will not work in reverse.

Hence the issue and the States stance. You can argue it all you want, maybe find a FA hammer and grind the Hook off to save a few bucks, but it ain't worth it.

In this State, even Possession of FA parts could be Prosecuted.

You need a Cheap AR Hammer? I will Give you one. I'd even send it to you on my Dime Free.


No, the hammer is designed 'solely' for a FA weapon but is not designed to be 'exclusive' to a FA weapon. For it to be excrusive to a FA weapon it would have to be designed to not work in a semi auto.

It's legal jargon that makes a difference.

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Wed Dec 13, 2017 6:22 pm

Legal Jargon? Yeah, I get that. So did Big Al.....Convicted in WA for possession of FA parts and manipulated kits.
Not to mention an SA AR with as manufactured FA parts.
http://www.mega.nu/batf/croaker/wood.html
http://www.keepandbeararms.com/informat ... sp?ID=1123

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:35 pm

usrifle wrote:Legal Jargon? Yeah, I get that. So did Big Al.....Convicted in WA for possession of FA parts and manipulated kits.
Not to mention an SA AR with as manufactured FA parts.
http://www.mega.nu/batf/croaker/wood.html
http://www.keepandbeararms.com/informat ... sp?ID=1123


You're arguing a different case than what is at issue here. Apples and oranges.

Rix didn't ask about using the parts as they are in a semi auto, he asked about the ownership of those parts in this state.

Re: Ar15/m16 parts and regulations

Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:38 pm

usrifle wrote:In this State, even Possession of FA parts could be Prosecuted.


I think we all know that anything can be prosecuted in this state with a clown of an AG.

No argument from me there.
Post a reply