Im sure Randall Cunningham would have done better

More "twisted" stats.. Yup Russell sure does suck.

Well in fact, 20 years ago, under far harder circumstances for a QB, he did comparable or better...

Give it up dude. Thats's plain bullshit.

GO HAWKS!

It's always so obvious you don't know what you're talking about, and are garbling your cut & pastes.....

You state "Seattle is #3 in passing attempts", while completely missing they are only 2nd, behind New England, in passing YARDAGE. That's what matters, how many yards are gained. So it's not 'top 1/3 of the league, it's top 2 of the whole league, in YARDS PER GAME.......Big difference.

Then you say "Duh. Several other QBs have more."

Duh infers people are stupid, yet you're the one spouting incorrect facts. Only 1 other has more, and he's considered by many to be the best that's ever played.

And saying 'several others' is a dead giveaway you're clueless.....

Oh, and this is priceless...."He also has 290 rushing yards. Eh. It's not uncommon for QBs to compile decent rushing stats from scrambling, often clipping off 20-30 yards at a time..."

Often? Really? Do you even watch ?

Thats why the average is 4-6 yards, because they get "20-30 at a time"....

Now THAT's a Duh!

What I find pretty comical in this dialogue is how the fanatically biased seaduck fanatics cannot coldly discuss facts without constant repeated personal attacks at anyone like me who dares challenge their GODLIKE seaducks.

If you pass a zillion times, you're going to complete passes and have yardage. Yet the averages are not impressive on completions or yardage, and INTs are relatively high. Thems the facts folks. And the seaducks rushing sucks. Overall offense is BARELY in the top 1/3rd, like 9 out of 32 or whatever. They are clinging on to their 6-3 record, which is also not particularly impressive. It's all down hill from here. Gonna get a smack down the rest of the season with no rushing game - it doesn't take a genius to know that relying on 1 guy for 82% of your offense production spells trouble. Contrary to what one might think, that's not a good statistic. You go down 1 key guy, like a lineman, or receiver, or even Wilson and the season is over.

You are not being personally attacked LC, you are fanatically trying to defend your biased opinion on a subject you have said you don't care about.

It's about the argument with you, it's not even the subject matter anymore.

A good Attorney knows when to quit, or knows his Jury well enough to try and present the argument in a manner which will sway the Jury to his opinion.

You haven't done that. As a matter of fact, you have done the opposite and then you want to play the Victim card.

There is a thread for Sports haters LC, but you seem to have forgotten about that one.

Haven't seen it on the new posts page in awhile, maybe you should resurrect it.

Dude you need to get a girlfriend, you say you hate pro sports but yet here you are acting like you know everything and just want to talk shit because you are bored. It would be ok to argue but you just have anxst. Find a hobby or something, get some pussy

My last post had no personal attacks, yet you resorted to calling names in your post.

You also are, yet again, incapable of linear thought. Instead of addressing my points, you jumped to interceptions.

Any QB would take a 19 TDs to 6 INTs ratio. One game where he had 2, he led us to an unbelievable comeback, and another game with one, he led us back.

You always wrote how people that talk about sports were losers, and you had better things to do with your time.

So, I guess the one name calling is you.

What's funny to me is, you come on this thread with your vitriolic posts, but at some point, you'll start a thread asking the great minds of the forum for some help or advice.

You realize it's the same people, right?

Personal attacks!?!?!! Where? You as a lawyer should have some thick skin, quit being a cry baby and sack up or get the fuck out of here. People that don't like the Seahawks will confirm the facts.

Too funny, every time someone refutes a point, he goes back & edits.

I love reading these personal attack posts.

Folks here bitch about keeping it on target and about NFL talk, but in the same post jab and poke.

And no, you don't hurt my feelings. I find it humorous.
And no, I don't care about trying to sway anyone here. At all. A jury is supposed to be an impartial finder of fact who will listen carefully to evidence and come to a reasonable conclusion. Folks on this thread suck at the tit of the seaducks and will never find fault with them. They could be win-less for the season and the 12 fanatics would claim they are the best team in history and offer endless excuses why they lost every game. Refs. Weather. Injuries. Lopsided footballs. You name it.

Everything seaducks is the most amazing creation in the world view of those deeply biased fanatics here.

I just relish in showing them wrong with facts and logic, and watching them go on full tilt personal attack mode.

The seaducks suck, they almost always have aside from a couple fluke seasons, and they always will.

Some people just like to stir the Pot. Then when they get "attacked" they play the Victim Card. Reminds me of something...just can't put my finger on it.
Hmmmm.....

Reading comprehension is a wonderful skill. No victim card playing here. Just pointing out facts.