|
|
|
It is currently Fri May 03, 2024 11:24 pm
|
Liberals and Other Weak Thinkers (and Joshua)
Author |
Message |
OhShoot!
Site Supporter
Location: Bellingham Canada Joined: Thu Jan 3, 2013 Posts: 4999
Real Name: Josheewa
|
sinus211 wrote: OhShoot! wrote: You're just jealous of my full head of luxurious hair. Is that what that is? I thought you were growing whey grass on your noggin. Like a real skinny chia pet. What the??... do you guys run in gangs or sumptin? Sheesh
_________________ It must be frustrating always being the smartest person in the room.-Jagerbomber35
Divided we fall.
|
Wed Jul 26, 2017 9:14 pm |
|
|
Duke EB
Site Supporter
Location: maple valley Joined: Mon May 6, 2013 Posts: 2575
Real Name: Earl
|
OhShoot! wrote: sinus211 wrote: OhShoot! wrote: You're just jealous of my full head of luxurious hair. Is that what that is? I thought you were growing whey grass on your noggin. Like a real skinny chia pet. What the??... do you guys run in gangs or sumptin? Sheesh He's just jealous
|
Wed Jul 26, 2017 9:19 pm |
|
|
jukk0u
Site Supporter
Location: Lynnwood and at large Joined: Wed May 1, 2013 Posts: 21336
Real Name: Vick Lagina
|
OhShoot! wrote: You're just jealous of my full head of luxurious hair. Here I was trying to be all respectful and polite and shiite.... that's a low blow, hippy!
_________________ “Finding ‘common ground’ with the thinking of evil men is a fool’s errand” ~ Herschel Smith
"The said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." ~ Samuel Adams
“A return to First Principles in a Republic is sometimes caused by simple virtues of a single man. His good example has such an influence that the good men strive to imitate him, and the wicked are ashamed to lead a life so contrary to his example. Before all else, be armed!” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
Láodòng zhèng zhūwèi zìyóu
FJB
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:36 am |
|
|
OhShoot!
Site Supporter
Location: Bellingham Canada Joined: Thu Jan 3, 2013 Posts: 4999
Real Name: Josheewa
|
jukk0u wrote: OhShoot! wrote: You're just jealous of my full head of luxurious hair. Here I was trying to be all respectful and polite and shiite.... that's a low blow, hippy!
_________________ It must be frustrating always being the smartest person in the room.-Jagerbomber35
Divided we fall.
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 7:27 am |
|
|
TINCANBANDIT
Site Supporter
Location: Mohave Valley Arizona Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 Posts: 13371
Real Name: Casey
|
_________________Actor portrayal, Action figures sold separately, You must be at least this tall to ride, Individual results may vary, Sales tax not included, All models are over 18 years of age, upon approval of credit, Quantities are limited while supplies last, Some restrictions apply, Not available with other offers, At participating locations only, Void where prohibited, Above terms subject to change without notice, Patent pending.See my blog: http://tincanbandit.blogspot.com/
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 7:33 am |
|
|
OhShoot!
Site Supporter
Location: Bellingham Canada Joined: Thu Jan 3, 2013 Posts: 4999
Real Name: Josheewa
|
Seems that you posted a link that calls out some of your own sources as Bullshit. Looks like your Bullshit detection expertise needs calibration. Not only that, but it calls out Dave Workman's Examiner as Bullshit. No shit. http://doubtfulnews.com/beyond-doubtful-sources/Inside: The Beyond Doubtful List (completely unreliable sources) Never send us stories from or link to these sources: Natural News (Mike Adams, “Health Ranger”) Before It’s News Info Wars / Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Mercola.com (Joe Mercola) CryptozoologyNews.com Topekasnews.com The Canadian (agoracosmopolitan.com/new) World News Daily Report World Net Daily (WND.com) Empire News (empirenews.net) Breitbart President Trump’s White House Press Secretary There are thousands of sources that say they have “news” but it’s not news or trustworthy due to spin and bias. Sites that are backed by religious organizations, anti-abortion advocates, Creationists, climate change denialists or others with anti-science or pro-conspiracy agendas are obviously not reliable sources. Don’t just trust. Verify Some sources have lots of pictures and high hit counts but their journalism is shaky and I’d rather not link to them. Tabloids, blogs, and other aggregate sites may have a real story but I will dig back to an original source and link to that. That includes the ever-popular Huffington Post which is mostly blogs, not good journalism. Be careful passing on stories from them. If you see a piece on any of the following sources, always check for an alternate source by Googling keywords or looking for the original source in the story. If there ISN’T another source, it’s likely too ridiculous to consider and not even deserving of comment (though there are exceptions). Check for a more reputable source if the story is from the following clickbait, mystery-mongering or pseudoscientific sites: Daily Mail (U.K.) The Sun (U.K.) The Mirror (U.K.) Examiner.com European Union Times RT.com Siberian Times Pravda.ru Buzzfeed Mother Nature News Epoch Times The Blaze Drudge Report IFLS (I Fucking Love Science) Ancient Origins Mysterious Universe Signs of the Times (sott.net) StrangeSounds.org Satire sites
_________________ It must be frustrating always being the smartest person in the room.-Jagerbomber35
Divided we fall.
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:11 am |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
OhShoot! wrote: Seems that you posted a link that calls out some of your own sources as Bullshit. Looks like your Bullshit detection expertise needs calibration. Not only that, but it calls out Dave Workman's Examiner as Bullshit. No shit. http://doubtfulnews.com/beyond-doubtful-sources/Inside: The Beyond Doubtful List (completely unreliable sources) Never send us stories from or link to these sources: Natural News (Mike Adams, “Health Ranger”) Before It’s News Info Wars / Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Mercola.com (Joe Mercola) CryptozoologyNews.com Topekasnews.com The Canadian (agoracosmopolitan.com/new) World News Daily Report World Net Daily (WND.com) Empire News (empirenews.net) Breitbart President Trump’s White House Press Secretary There are thousands of sources that say they have “news” but it’s not news or trustworthy due to spin and bias. Sites that are backed by religious organizations, anti-abortion advocates, Creationists, climate change denialists or others with anti-science or pro-conspiracy agendas are obviously not reliable sources. Don’t just trust. Verify Some sources have lots of pictures and high hit counts but their journalism is shaky and I’d rather not link to them. Tabloids, blogs, and other aggregate sites may have a real story but I will dig back to an original source and link to that. That includes the ever-popular Huffington Post which is mostly blogs, not good journalism. Be careful passing on stories from them. If you see a piece on any of the following sources, always check for an alternate source by Googling keywords or looking for the original source in the story. If there ISN’T another source, it’s likely too ridiculous to consider and not even deserving of comment (though there are exceptions). Check for a more reputable source if the story is from the following clickbait, mystery-mongering or pseudoscientific sites: Daily Mail (U.K.) The Sun (U.K.) The Mirror (U.K.) Examiner.com European Union Times RT.com Siberian Times Pravda.ru Buzzfeed Mother Nature News Epoch Times The Blaze Drudge Report IFLS (I Fucking Love Science) Ancient Origins Mysterious Universe Signs of the Times (sott.net) StrangeSounds.org Satire sites I saw how fast you edited your reply... Fortunately I had two windows open because I immediately saw it... By the way, "some" is wrong because it implies more than 1 when used in this context as a qualifier of a group of multiple nouns when referencing a list (I had a tough English teacher), I count only one from that list. Did you even read it before posting?
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:18 am |
|
|
OhShoot!
Site Supporter
Location: Bellingham Canada Joined: Thu Jan 3, 2013 Posts: 4999
Real Name: Josheewa
|
Alpine wrote: OhShoot! wrote: Seems that you posted a link that calls out some of your own sources as Bullshit. Looks like your Bullshit detection expertise needs calibration. Not only that, but it calls out Dave Workman's Examiner as Bullshit. No shit. http://doubtfulnews.com/beyond-doubtful-sources/Inside: The Beyond Doubtful List (completely unreliable sources) Never send us stories from or link to these sources: Natural News (Mike Adams, “Health Ranger”) Before It’s News Info Wars / Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Mercola.com (Joe Mercola) CryptozoologyNews.com Topekasnews.com The Canadian (agoracosmopolitan.com/new) World News Daily Report World Net Daily (WND.com) Empire News (empirenews.net) Breitbart President Trump’s White House Press Secretary There are thousands of sources that say they have “news” but it’s not news or trustworthy due to spin and bias. Sites that are backed by religious organizations, anti-abortion advocates, Creationists, climate change denialists or others with anti-science or pro-conspiracy agendas are obviously not reliable sources. Don’t just trust. Verify Some sources have lots of pictures and high hit counts but their journalism is shaky and I’d rather not link to them. Tabloids, blogs, and other aggregate sites may have a real story but I will dig back to an original source and link to that. That includes the ever-popular Huffington Post which is mostly blogs, not good journalism. Be careful passing on stories from them. If you see a piece on any of the following sources, always check for an alternate source by Googling keywords or looking for the original source in the story. If there ISN’T another source, it’s likely too ridiculous to consider and not even deserving of comment (though there are exceptions). Check for a more reputable source if the story is from the following clickbait, mystery-mongering or pseudoscientific sites: Daily Mail (U.K.) The Sun (U.K.) The Mirror (U.K.) Examiner.com European Union Times RT.com Siberian Times Pravda.ru Buzzfeed Mother Nature News Epoch Times The Blaze Drudge Report IFLS (I Fucking Love Science) Ancient Origins Mysterious Universe Signs of the Times (sott.net) StrangeSounds.org Satire sites I saw how fast you edited your reply... Fortunately I had two windows open because I immediately saw it... By the way, "some" is wrong because it implies more than 1 when used in this context as a qualifier of a group of multiple nouns when referencing a list (I had a tough English teacher), I count only one from that list. Did you even read it before posting? nice red herring argument. Your favorite kind. My editing was for done because I didn't like the wording. So the fuck what?? 8oops there I edited again, but my argument still stands solid. awww geeeeez 3rd edit.. You're on to me
_________________ It must be frustrating always being the smartest person in the room.-Jagerbomber35
Divided we fall.
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:21 am |
|
|
L_O_G
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 13486
Real Name: JP
|
Why don't you two go fill some pillow cases with Kale and fight it out?
I got $10 on it to the winner
_________________ Yes I Do Have A Beautiful Daughter.. I Also Have A Gun, A Shovel, & An Alibi
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:26 am |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
OhShoot! wrote: Alpine wrote: OhShoot! wrote: Seems that you posted a link that calls out some of your own sources as Bullshit. Looks like your Bullshit detection expertise needs calibration. Not only that, but it calls out Dave Workman's Examiner as Bullshit. No shit. http://doubtfulnews.com/beyond-doubtful-sources/Inside: The Beyond Doubtful List (completely unreliable sources) Never send us stories from or link to these sources: Natural News (Mike Adams, “Health Ranger”) Before It’s News Info Wars / Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Mercola.com (Joe Mercola) CryptozoologyNews.com Topekasnews.com The Canadian (agoracosmopolitan.com/new) World News Daily Report World Net Daily (WND.com) Empire News (empirenews.net) Breitbart President Trump’s White House Press Secretary There are thousands of sources that say they have “news” but it’s not news or trustworthy due to spin and bias. Sites that are backed by religious organizations, anti-abortion advocates, Creationists, climate change denialists or others with anti-science or pro-conspiracy agendas are obviously not reliable sources. Don’t just trust. Verify Some sources have lots of pictures and high hit counts but their journalism is shaky and I’d rather not link to them. Tabloids, blogs, and other aggregate sites may have a real story but I will dig back to an original source and link to that. That includes the ever-popular Huffington Post which is mostly blogs, not good journalism. Be careful passing on stories from them. If you see a piece on any of the following sources, always check for an alternate source by Googling keywords or looking for the original source in the story. If there ISN’T another source, it’s likely too ridiculous to consider and not even deserving of comment (though there are exceptions). Check for a more reputable source if the story is from the following clickbait, mystery-mongering or pseudoscientific sites: Daily Mail (U.K.) The Sun (U.K.) The Mirror (U.K.) Examiner.com European Union Times RT.com Siberian Times Pravda.ru Buzzfeed Mother Nature News Epoch Times The Blaze Drudge Report IFLS (I Fucking Love Science) Ancient Origins Mysterious Universe Signs of the Times (sott.net) StrangeSounds.org Satire sites I saw how fast you edited your reply... Fortunately I had two windows open because I immediately saw it... By the way, "some" is wrong because it implies more than 1 when used in this context as a qualifier of a group of multiple nouns when referencing a list (I had a tough English teacher), I count only one from that list. Did you even read it before posting? nice red herring argument. Your favorite kind. My editing was for done because I didn't like the wording. So the fuck what?? 8oops there I edited again, but my argument still stands solid. awww geeeeez 3rd edit.. You're on to me No, you edited your post because it was factually wrong. Quote: Definition of most 1 : greatest in quantity, extent, or degree the most ability 2 : the majority of most people When you make factually inaccurate statements or exaggerate to make a point, it detracts from the point. The fact that you did so to attempt to point out something you thought the person you were quoting had failed to read/notice is particularly ironic given your own mistakes here. Plank before splinter...
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:26 am |
|
|
OhShoot!
Site Supporter
Location: Bellingham Canada Joined: Thu Jan 3, 2013 Posts: 4999
Real Name: Josheewa
|
nope, you are wrong here. Go back for remedial english. (2) Daily caller quotes and an ethics alarm quote do qualify as some. Read the whole of my post again without nitpicking single words. The claim stands. oops. Edited again.
_________________ It must be frustrating always being the smartest person in the room.-Jagerbomber35
Divided we fall.
Last edited by OhShoot! on Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:34 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:28 am |
|
|
PMB
In Memoriam
Joined: Wed Mar 6, 2013 Posts: 12018
|
Still a Red Herring. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/too ... ed-HerringDon't let this get sidetracked into a pillow fight. Unless there are good pics.
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:28 am |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
Actually not, only one source and one link was from that list. Given the several other links provided serving as a preponderance of evidence, pointing out how the attempt to discredit the sources started off deceptively listing one source as discrediting MOST of the sources was germane.
Fine, lets play Devil's Advocate and throw out the Breitbart article in this instances, the others still stand and, again ironically, that constitutes MOST of the sources and MOST of the links.
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:35 am |
|
|
OhShoot!
Site Supporter
Location: Bellingham Canada Joined: Thu Jan 3, 2013 Posts: 4999
Real Name: Josheewa
|
Alpine wrote: Actually not, only one source and one link was from that list. Given the several other links provided serving as a preponderance of evidence, pointing out how the attempt to discredit the sources started off deceptively listing one source as discrediting MOST of the sources was germane.
Fine, lets play Devil's Advocate and throw out the Breitbart article in this instances, the others still stand and, again ironically, that constitutes MOST of the sources and MOST of the links. ok. I agree to disagree.
_________________ It must be frustrating always being the smartest person in the room.-Jagerbomber35
Divided we fall.
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:36 am |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
OhShoot! wrote: nope, you are wrong here. Go back for remedial english. (2) Daily caller quotes and an ethics alarm quote do qualify as some. Read the whole of my post again without nitpicking single words. The claim stands. oops. Edited again. Daily Caller and Ethics Alarm weren't on that list or on the webpage I went to from your link....
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:37 am |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|