Well, I will be up north working on the 1st. I will be in my truck and it would *almost* bother me to have to drive through/over folks illegally blocking my way to work or home.... Who am I kidding, I have no qualms...

I was telling someone the other day...

These people like Insleee and Shawant are the kids we used to either ignore or oughtright fuk with when we were in school.

Insleeee was the stinky turd that couldn't throw a ball, hated Gym class and wouldn't take a shower after. We'd snap towels on his ass, stuff him in his locker or toss his books off the top of the stairs.

And Shawaaant was the booger eating pizza face gal all the girls teased that wasn't cool enough to even get in the Yearbook club.......

Now They're paying us back.

Looks like someone heard me over the internets....
Here is a sheriff with balls. We need a Sheriff that will do the same thing but put her in immediate Federal custody and immediately flown out of State to face Federal charges so her (local) friends can't communicate with her and get her out. This bitch needs to be stopped immediately.

So, we need a Sheriff, a Federal agent and a ride docked at the airport/hanger/runway.
She will take care of the Federal charges for us.....

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/03/28/sheriff-hodgson-arrest-leaders-sanctuary-cities-massachusetts-illegal-immigration/

http://www.wbur.org/news/2017/03/28/bristol-sheriff-sanctuary-cities

Yeah Snozz, no state Income Tax.....YET. It's not even writing on the Wall anymore, it's being talked about in state Government.

https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/files/cos/Power%20and%20Authority%20of%20The%20County%20Sheriff.pdf

"If a poli
tician, judge or prosecutor violates the Constituti
on,
it is the duty of the Sheriff and the U.S. Marshall
to call the Grand Jury and ask the People for an
Indictment. This is the Sheriff’s responsibility. W
ere the Sheriff to seek “permission” of a prosecuto
r
or judge for an arrest of a politician, judge or pr
osecutor whom the Sheriff finds in violation of the
Constitution, the Sheriff would be disempowering hi
s own authority; he would be functioning as a tool
to the very ones violating the Constitution; he wou
ld, thereby, be violating his own oath. Obviously
then, no politician can come between the Sheriff an
d the People. Regardless of what they have been
taught, it is the duty of the Sheriff to seek an in
dictment, not the prosecutor. Prosecutors call the
Grand
Jury when the state has an issue; but, the Peoples’
business is the Sheriff’s business; and, it is the
Sheriff’s duty to protect the People from those who
would encroach upon their rights. Likewise, the
courts were designed to exist for the purpose of se
rving and protecting the People from criminals and
tyrants. "

Ignorant, vapid people rooting Sawant on. Mostly people who want what? Something FROM the .gov. Paid for by someone else, someone rich. You know, the people we hate. Same shit, different day.

It seems that the meaning of RICH is changing slightly...

In San Fransicko (Seattle Sister City) a family of 4 making $105,000 is now considered poverty/low income.

http://www.ktvu.com/news/250377281-story

Wonder what the poverty/low income salary is in Seattle?

It'd be nice to see what the vermin hypocrite protesters run by Shit-heel Socialist Shawaaant are making per year?

Is min wage 15 an hour yet? Yup that's what they make

Easily half those people don't work. Trump's fault.

Posted on Twitter by a WSP PAO.
Basic message, keep your bullshit in Seattle and off the highway or your ass might get hit by a car.

Plain and simple, should Ms. Sawant or any of her ilk find themselves on I-5 at any time on May 1, they should expect to be run the F@#k over. No F@#ks given.



Ric

Time to weld the spikes on.

So that's why they call it soylent green!